Reply to ``Comment on `Localized behavior near the Zn impurity in Y Ba 2 Cu 4 O 8 as measured by nuclear quadrupole resonance' ''

Julien et al. have commented on two of our publications, claiming that we have made erroneous interpretations of the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and nuclear quadrupole resonance data. Specifically, they believe that their model of an extended staggered moment about a Zn impurity is the only interpretation of the data [Julien et al., Phys. Rev Lett. 84, 3422 (2000)]. Not only does their claim ignore models presented by other authors, we show that the model of Julien et al. [Phys. Rev Lett. 84, 3422 (2000)] does not consistently reproduce all of the NMR data.