Empirical impact of near-separatrix plasma and neutral transport on the pedestal in the transition between EDA and ELMy H-modes on Alcator C-Mod
/ Authors
M. A. Miller, J. Hughes, S. Saarelma, T. Eich, J. Dunsmore, J. Han, P. Manz, J. Connor, G. Tynan, A. Hubbard
and 9 more authors
A. Ho, T. Body, D. Silvagni, O. Grover, S. Mordijck, E. Edlund, B. LaBombard, M. Wigram, A. Cavallaro
/ Abstract
The transition between the ELMy H-mode and the EDA H-mode is studied on Alcator C-Mod using an experimental database and predictive pedestal models. High-resolution Thomson scattering measurements are used to compare the pedestal density, $n_{e}^\mathrm{ped}$, and the separatrix density, $n_{e}^\mathrm{sep}$ with main chamber neutral measurements. $n_{e}^\mathrm{ped}$ is sensitive to neutral sources only in the ELMy H-mode regime and not in the EDA H-mode regime. Density fluctuation spectra reveal that quasi-coherent structures become stronger at higher densities and more coherent in the EDA relative to the inter-ELM phases of ELMy H-modes, before weakening again at the highest values of $n_{e}^\mathrm{ped}$. The Saarelma-Connor pedestal density prediction model is validated for ELMy H-modes up to $n_{e}^\mathrm{ped} = 2.0 \times 10^{20}$ m$^{-3}$. An additional transport channel driven by resistive ballooning modes (RBM), $D_\mathrm{RBM}$, scaling directly with $\alpha_{t}$ and inversely with $k_\mathrm{RBM}^{2}\hat{q}_\mathrm{cyl}$ is shown to improve the prediction for EDA H-modes, finding good model agreement up to $n_{e}^\mathrm{ped} = 3.0 \times 10^{20}$ m$^{-3}$. EPED scans in $n_{e}^\mathrm{ped}$ are then performed at three values of $n_{e}^\mathrm{sep}/n_{e}^\mathrm{ped}$. Increasing this ratio moves the peeling-ballooning branch transition to lower $n_{e}^\mathrm{ped}$, increasing $p^\mathrm{ped}$ in the peeling branch and decreasing it in the ballooning branch. Agreement is found for large ELM H-modes. SPARC pedestal density predictions for an ELMy and an EDA/QCE-like H-mode are performed and found consistent with assumptions used in previous EPED modeling. Inclusion of $D_\mathrm{RBM}$ significantly weakens the density gradient near the separatrix, lowering $n_{e}^\mathrm{ped}$ by approximately 20%.