A Test of Substellar Evolutionary Models with High-Precision Ages from Asteroseismology and Gyrochronology for the Benchmark System HR 7672AB
astro-ph.SR
/ Authors
Yaguang Li, Michael C. Liu, Trent J. Dupuy, Daniel Huber, Jingwen Zhang, Daniel Hey, R. R. Costa, Jens Reersted Larsen, J. M. Joel Ong, Sarbani Basu
and 28 more authors
Travis S. Metcalfe, Yixiao Zhou, Jennifer van Saders, Timothy R. Bedding, Marc Hon, Hans Kjeldsen, Tiago L. Campante, Mário J. P. F. G. Monteiro, Mia Sloth Lundkvist, Mark Lykke Winther, Ashley Chontos, Nicholas Saunders, Theron W. Carmichael, Antonin Bouchez, Carlos Alvarez, Samuel A. U. Walker, Aldo G. Sepulveda, Howard Isaacson, Andrew W. Howard, Steven R. Gibson, Samuel Halverson, Kodi Rider
/ Abstract
We present high-precision measurements for HR~7672AB, composed of a Sun-like (G0V) star and an L~dwarf companion. Three nights of precise (70 cm/s) radial velocity (RV) asteroseismology with the Keck Planet Finder clearly detect 5-minute oscillations from the primary HR~7672A, and modeling of the frequency spectrum yields an asteroseismic age of $1.87\pm0.65$~Gyr. We also determine a gyrochronological age of $2.58\pm0.47$~Gyr, and we combine these two results for a final age of $2.26\pm0.40$~Gyr. In addition, we obtained new RVs for HR~7672A and new astrometry for the companion HR~7672B. From a joint orbit fit, we measured a dynamical mass of $1.111\pm0.017$~$\text{M}_\odot$ for HR~7672A and $75.39\pm0.67$~$\text{M}_{\text{Jup}}$ for HR~7672B. This places the companion near the stellar/substellar boundary and thus particularly sensitive to differences in model predictions. The joint precision in host star age (18\% uncertainty) and companion mass (0.9\% uncertainty) makes HR~7672AB an exceptional substellar benchmark. Combined with the companion's luminosity, we use these measurements to test predictions from six brown dwarf cooling models. The best agreement occurs with the Chabrier et al. (2023) models, which incorporate a new equation of state, resulting in predictions that agree within $<$0.3$σ$ with all the observations. The other 5 sets of models agree at the 1--3$σ$ level depending on the particular test, and some models struggle to predict a sufficient low luminosity for HR~7672B at any age given its dynamical mass. We also detected a weak seismic signal in near-simultaneous TESS photometry of HR~7672A, with the resulting RV-to-photometry oscillation amplitude ratio consistent with solar values.