HCAST: Human-Calibrated Autonomy Software Tasks
/ Authors
David Rein, Joel Becker, Amy Deng, Seraphina Nix, C. Cañal, Daniel O'Connel, Pip Arnott, Ryan Bloom, Thomas Broadley, Katharyn Garcia
and 12 more authors
Brian Goodrich, M. Hasin, Sami Jawhar, Megan Kinniment, Thomas Kwa, Aron Lajko, Nate Rush, L. Sato, Sydney von Arx, Ben West, Lawrence Chan, Elizabeth Barnes
/ Abstract
To understand and predict the societal impacts of highly autonomous AI systems, we need benchmarks with grounding, i.e., metrics that directly connect AI performance to real-world effects we care about. We present HCAST (Human-Calibrated Autonomy Software Tasks), a benchmark of 189 machine learning engineering, cybersecurity, software engineering, and general reasoning tasks. We collect 563 human baselines (totaling over 1500 hours) from people skilled in these domains, working under identical conditions as AI agents, which lets us estimate that HCAST tasks take humans between one minute and 8+ hours. Measuring the time tasks take for humans provides an intuitive metric for evaluating AI capabilities, helping answer the question"can an agent be trusted to complete a task that would take a human X hours?"We evaluate the success rates of AI agents built on frontier foundation models, and we find that current agents succeed 70-80% of the time on tasks that take humans less than one hour, and less than 20% of the time on tasks that take humans more than 4 hours.
Journal: ArXiv