New experimental constraint on the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts /><mml:none /><mml:mn>185</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>γ</mml
/ Authors
A. Larsen, G. Tveten, T. Renstrøm, H. Utsunomiya, E. Alğin, T. Ari-izumi, K. Ay, F. B. Bello Garrote, L. Crespo Campo, F. Furmyr
and 21 more authors
S. Goriely, A. Görgen, M. Guttormsen, V. W. Ingeberg, B. V. Kheswa, I. Kullmann, T. Laplace, E. Lima, M. Markova, J. E. Midtbø, S. Miyamoto, A. Mjøs, V. Modamio, M. Ozgur, F. Pogliano, S. Riemer-Sørensen, E. Sahin, S. Shen, S. Siem, A. Spyrou, M. Wiedeking
/ Abstract
In this work, we present new data on the $^{182,183,184}$W($\gamma,n$) cross sections, utilizing a quasi-monochromatic photon beam produced at the NewSUBARU synchrotron radiation facility. Further, we have extracted the nuclear level density and $\gamma$-ray strength function of $^{186}$W from data on the $^{186}$W($\alpha,\alpha^\prime\gamma$)$^{186}$W reaction measured at the Oslo Cyclotron Laboratory. Combining previous measurements on the $^{186}$W($\gamma,n$) cross section with our new $^{182,183,184}$W($\gamma,n$) and ($\alpha,\alpha^\prime\gamma$)$^{186}$W data sets, we have deduced the $^{186}$W $\gamma$-ray strength function in the range of $1<E_\gamma<6$ MeV and $7<E_\gamma<14$ MeV. Our data are used to extract the level density and $\gamma$-ray strength functions needed as input to the nuclear-reaction code \textsf{TALYS}, providing an indirect, experimental constraint for the $^{185}$W($n,\gamma$)$^{186}$W cross section and reaction rate. Compared to the recommended Maxwellian-averaged cross section (MACS) in the KADoNiS-1.0 data base, our results are on average lower for the relevant energy range $k_B T \in [5,100]$ keV, and we provide a smaller uncertainty for the MACS. The theoretical values of Bao \textit{et al.} and the cross section experimentally constrained on photoneutron data of Sonnabend \textit{et al.} are significantly higher than our result. The lower value by Mohr \textit{et al.} is in very good agreement with our deduced MACS. Our new results could have implications for the $s$-process and in particular the predicted $s$-process production of $^{186,187}$Os nuclei.
Journal: Physical Review C