Geometric and growth rate tests of General Relativity with recovered linear cosmological perturbations

I investigate the consistency of the VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey v7 galaxy sample with the expansion history and linear growth rate predicted by General Relativity (GR) and a Planck (2015) cosmology. To do so, I measure the redshift-space power spectrum, which is anisotropic due to both redshift-space distortions (RSD) and the Alcock-Paczynski (AP) effect. In Chapter 6, I place constraints of $f σ_8(0.76) = 0.44 \pm 0.04$ and $f σ_8(1.05) = 0.28 \pm 0.08$, which remain consistent with GR at 95% confidence. Marginalising over the anisotropic AP effect degrades the constraints by a factor of three but allows $F_{AP} \equiv (1+z) D_A H/c$ to be simultaneously constrained. The VIPERS v7 joint-posterior on $(f σ_8, F_{AP})$ shows no compelling deviation from GR. Chapter 7 investigates the inclusion of a simple density transform: `clipping' prior to the RSD analysis. This tackles the root-cause of non-linearity and may extend the validity of perturbation theory. Moreover, this marked statistic would amplify signatures of shielded modified gravity models and includes information not available to the power spectrum. I show that a linear real-space power spectrum with a Kaiser factor and a Lorentzian damping yields a significant bias without clipping, but that this may be removed with a strict threshold; similar behaviour is observed for the data. Estimates of $f σ_8$ for different thresholds are highly correlated, but this may be obtained using mocks. A maximum likelihood estimate from a combination of thresholds is shown to achieve a 16% decrease in statistical error relative to a single-threshold estimate. The results are encouraging to date but represent a work in progress; the final analysis will be submitted to Astronomy & Astrophysics as Wilson et al. (2016).