Recovering the equivalence of ensembles

The equivalence of thermodynamic results in the canonical and the microcanonical ensembles has been questioned in some calculations for spin models with long-range interactions. We show that these claims of inequivalence are related to an inadequate definition of the independent (density) variables in the microcanonical ensemble. We illustrate this point with the example of a simple spin-1 ideal paramagnet, and then revisit the original calculations of Barré, Mukamel, and Ruffo, for a mean-field spin-1 Blume-Capel model. If the microcanonical ensemble is defined in terms of adequate density variables, we show that there is no disagreement with the calculations in the usual canonical ensemble (with fixed thermodynamic field variables).