Measurement of CP violating asymmetries in B^0 -> K^+K^- K^0_S decays with a time-dependent Dalitz approach
hep-ex
/ Authors
Belle Collaboration, Y. Nakahama, K. Sumisawa, H. Aihara, K. Arinstein, T. Aushev, T. Aziz, A. M. Bakich, V. Balagura, K. Belous
and 126 more authors
V. Bhardwaj, M. Bischofberger, A. Bondar, G. Bonvicini, A. Bozek, M. Bracko, T. E. Browder, P. Chang, Y. Chao, A. Chen, P. Chen, B. G. Cheon, C. -C. Chiang, I. -S. Cho, Y. Choi, J. Dalseno, A. Das, Z. Dolezal, Z. Drasal, A. Drutskoy, S. Eidelman, P. Goldenzweig, B. Golob, J. Haba
/ Abstract
We report a measurement of $CP$ violating asymmetries in $B^0(\overline{B}^0) \to K^+ K^- K^0_S$ decays with a time-dependent Dalitz approach. This analysis is based on a data sample of $657\times 10^6$ $B\overline{B}$ pairs accumulated at the $Υ(4S)$ resonance with the Belle detector at the KEKB asymmetric-energy $e^+e^-$ collider. As the result of an unbinned maximum likelihood fit to the selected candidates, the mixing-induced and direct $CP$ violation parameters, $φ^{\rm eff}_1$ and ${\cal A}_{CP}$ are obtained for $B^0 \to φ(1020) K^0_S$, $B^0 \to f_0(980) K^0_S$ and other $B^0 \to K^+ K^- K^0_S$ decays. We find four solutions that describe the data. There are \{eqnarray*} φ_1^{\rm eff}(B^0\to φ(1020) K^0_S) & = & (32.2 \pm 9.0 \pm 2.6 \pm 1.4)^{\circ}; φ_1^{\rm eff}(B^0\to φ(1020) K^0_S) & = & (26.2 \pm 8.8 \pm 2.7 \pm 1.2)^{\circ};\\ φ_1^{\rm eff}(B^0\to φ(1020) K^0_S) & = & (27.3 \pm 8.6 \pm 2.8 \pm 1.3)^{\circ}\; {\rm and}\\ φ_1^{\rm eff}(B^0\to φ(1020) K^0_S) & = & (24.3 \pm 8.0 \pm 2.9 \pm 5.2)^{\circ}.{eqnarray*}\ The values for the $CP$ violating phase in $B^0\to φ(1020) K^0_S$ are similar but other properties of the Dalitz plot are quite different for the four solutions. These four solutions have consistent $φ^{\rm eff}_1$ values for all three $B$ meson decay channels and none of them deviates significantly from the values measured in $B \to (c\bar{c}) K^0$ decays with the currently available statistics. In addition, we find no significant direct $CP$ violation.